A scoping note within ten working days
Whether a ninety day pilot is possible, what would be tested, and what would have to be true at the end for it to count. Or a plain statement that we cannot help.
If you are a ministry, an agency, a region or a public innovation body, you are usually offered cooperation agreements and delegations. What you need is one problem tested against real technologies, inside one budget cycle, ending in a decision you can defend. KyoLink finds the candidate technologies on the other side of the corridor, runs the pilot as one programme, and writes down what happened whether or not it worked.
Whether a ninety day pilot is possible, what would be tested, and what would have to be true at the end for it to count. Or a plain statement that we cannot help.
Named organisations on the other side that fit the problem, approached properly, with the same facts given to both sides in their own language.
Each technology becomes its own requirement with its own counterparty and its own evaluation. They are run as one pilot with one timetable, so your team has one conversation and not five.
Continue, scale, hand over or stop, with the reason. Counted from the day the pilot starts, and not moved because the answer is inconvenient.
A pilot is a container. It produces several requirements, each with its own counterparty and its own evaluation, and it carries one decision over all of them. That is the difference between a pilot and a procurement: a procurement asks who is cheapest at a thing you have already decided on, and a pilot asks whether the thing works here at all.
Before the first day, three things are agreed in writing: who runs the work, who signs the contract, and who pays. For a cross-border pilot these commonly have three different answers, and leaving any of them implicit is how a programme arrives at month four with two organisations each assuming the other was responsible.
The decision date is ninety days from the start. It is counted, not chosen, and it does not move because a supplier is late or because the answer is awkward. On that day the decision is written down: continue, scale, hand over, or stop, with the reason. A pilot that stopped is recorded in the same words as one that continued.
What is published about any of it, afterwards, is published only with your written permission, and nothing names your organisation without a separate permission given for that purpose.
The most useful first message describes a problem your organisation already has, in your own words, with the constraint that makes it difficult. You do not need to know which technology would solve it. Finding that is the part we do.
If the question is whether a pilot is even possible, the scoping note answers it in ten working days and costs nothing. It is a short written assessment, not a proposal, and it is as likely to say no as yes.
Send the problem and the constraint. You will have a written answer within ten working days, either way.